New York City Mayor Eric Adams has decided not to veto a bill that would expand the City Council’s oversight of mayoral appointments.
The legislation, which passed with a veto-proof majority in June, would give the Council authority over 20 additional commissioner appointments for agencies such as sanitation, buildings, and homeless services.
During a media briefing, Adams expressed his decision to avoid further confrontations.
“This administration’s success has been overshadowed by all of these back-and-forth debates. I’m just not doing that anymore,” he stated.
Despite his criticisms of the bill as a power grab, Adams’ refusal to veto enables the City Council to potentially avoid a veto override attempt, which would have been the third such instance this year.
However, the bill’s implementation still faces significant obstacles.
It requires voter approval in a general election referendum, and there’s a chance that separate initiatives by Adams’ Charter Revision Commission could prevent it from appearing on the November ballot.
Council Speaker Adrienne Adams’ office urged the mayor to allow New Yorkers to vote on the proposal this November and suggested postponing his own ballot measures until 2025.
Julia Agos, a spokesperson for the City Council, also criticized the mayor’s non-action as either a subtle endorsement of the bill or a clear sign that the commission aims to block this democratic process.
“Mayor Adams’ inaction is tacit approval of this proposal expanding advice and consent, or a blatant admission that his Charter Revision Commission’s mission is simply to block New Yorkers from exercising this democratic right,” Agos remarked in a statement.
Adams, however, denied any link between the commission’s work and the new legislation.
“It has nothing to do with the charter revision. It has to do with I don’t want New Yorkers to believe I’m fighting with someone, I’m fighting for New Yorkers,” he clarified.
The Charter Revision Commission’s final public hearing is scheduled for July 25, and its preliminary report did not mention the advice and consent legislation.
