• Advertise
  • Contact
Saturday, July 5, 2025
Islamic Voice News
  • Login
  • Home
  • News
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Caribbean and Latin American
    • Europe
    • Middle East
    • South Africa
    • U.S. and Canada
  • New York
    • NYC Elections 2025
      • Comptroller Candidates Forum
      • Public Advocate Candidates Forum
      • Meet The Candidate Video Interview Series
    • Adams Adminstration
    • City Council
    • Crime and Public Safety
    • Education
    • Metro
    • School Safety
  • Cape Town
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Home
  • News
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Caribbean and Latin American
    • Europe
    • Middle East
    • South Africa
    • U.S. and Canada
  • New York
    • NYC Elections 2025
      • Comptroller Candidates Forum
      • Public Advocate Candidates Forum
      • Meet The Candidate Video Interview Series
    • Adams Adminstration
    • City Council
    • Crime and Public Safety
    • Education
    • Metro
    • School Safety
  • Cape Town
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
New York Voice
No Result
View All Result
Home News U.S. and Canada

District of Columbia Files Lawsuit Against Amazon Over Delivery Exclusions in Black Neighborhoods

Isabella Rodriguez by Isabella Rodriguez
December 5, 2024
in U.S. and Canada
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The District of Columbia filed a lawsuit against Amazon on Wednesday, December 4th, accusing the company of secretly denying residents in two predominantly Black neighborhoods access to the fast delivery benefits of its Prime membership while continuing to charge them the full price. The suit alleges that Amazon misled nearly 50,000 Prime members in Wards 7 and 8, who paid for expedited shipping services that Amazon failed to provide.

The complaint, filed in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, centers on Amazon’s delivery practices and the company’s failure to disclose service changes. According to the lawsuit, in mid-2022, Amazon imposed a “delivery exclusion” on ZIP codes 20019 and 20020, which cover parts of Wards 7 and 8. Despite continuing to charge the full $139 annual fee for Prime memberships, Amazon switched from using its delivery network to third-party services, such as UPS and the U.S. Postal Service, for these areas. As a result, residents experienced slower delivery times.

Amazon, however, defended its decision, citing concerns over driver safety. “There have been specific and targeted acts against drivers delivering Amazon packages,” said Kelly Nantel, an Amazon spokesperson. “We made the deliberate choice to adjust our operations, including delivery routes and times, for the sole reason of protecting the safety of drivers.”

While the company maintains that safety was the driving factor, District Attorney General Brian Schwalb argued that Amazon’s actions were deceptive. “Amazon is charging tens of thousands of hard-working Ward 7 and 8 residents for an expedited delivery service it promises but does not provide,” Schwalb said. “It cannot covertly decide that a dollar in one ZIP code is worth less than a dollar in another.”

The lawsuit also highlights the impact of these changes on residents. With fewer retail stores and services in the area, many affected individuals rely heavily on Amazon for deliveries. In fact, over the past four years, residents in these ZIP codes have placed more than 4.5 million orders through Prime. Before the exclusion, over 72% of Prime packages in these neighborhoods were delivered within two days. By 2023, that number dropped to just 24%, starkly contrasting the 75% delivery rate for Prime members in other parts of the city.

While Amazon claims it continues to deliver some products quickly, the lawsuit asserts that the company’s lack of transparency about the changes misled customers into believing they were receiving the same service as others. “The claims made by the attorney general, that our business practices are somehow discriminatory or deceptive, are categorically false,” Nantel stated.

The case continues to draw attention to concerns about disparities in service across neighborhoods, especially in predominantly Black areas.

Related Posts

House of Representatives Set to Vote on Trump’s Policy Bill After Senate Approval
Trump Administration

House of Representatives Set to Vote on Trump’s Policy Bill After Senate Approval

by Isabella Rodriguez
July 2, 2025
Judge Blocks DHS Attempt to End Haitian Migrant Protections
Trump Administration

Judge Blocks DHS Attempt to End Haitian Migrant Protections

by Tamara Brown
July 2, 2025
City Services Disrupted as 9,000 Workers Strike in Philadelphia
U.S. and Canada

City Services Disrupted as 9,000 Workers Strike in Philadelphia

by Tamara Brown
July 1, 2025
Senate Begins Crucial Vote on Trump’s Expansive Tax and Spending Plan
Trump Administration

Senate Begins Crucial Vote on Trump’s Expansive Tax and Spending Plan

by Maria Cruz
June 30, 2025
Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions in Birthright Citizenship Case
U.S. and Canada

Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions in Birthright Citizenship Case

by Isabella Rodriguez
June 27, 2025

Translate

No Result
View All Result

Prayer times for your location

6 Kalimas

99 Names of Allah

© 2024 Islamic Voice News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Caribbean and Latin American
    • Europe
    • Middle East
    • South Africa
    • U.S. and Canada
  • New York
    • Adams Adminstration
    • City Council
    • Crime and Public Safety
    • Education
    • Metro
    • School Safety
  • Cape Town
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Advertise
  • Contact

© 2024 Islamic Voice News. All Rights Reserved.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?